Skip to content
Opinion

Kabul Is Running Thirsty: Why Water Must Come Before Roads

An editorial column on Kabul’s falling groundwater, the conditional 2030 warning, the proposed Sayad water transfer, and a practical response to the water crisis.

Published

Updated

3 min read

It is easy to measure a city’s progress in new roads, bridges and buildings. But there is a more fundamental test: what are those roads worth if the people living beside them cannot obtain safe drinking water?

A Pashto-language social media post about Kabul has raised precisely this question. It says groundwater levels have dropped by 25 to 30 metres in the last decade and warns that the city’s aquifers could run dry by 2030. The figures are not simply an internet rumour. They reflect a serious assessment, though the date needs careful qualification.

In April 2025, Mercy Corps reported that Kabul’s aquifer levels had fallen by 25–30 metres over ten years, while extraction exceeded natural replenishment by around 44 million cubic metres annually. It described more than 120,000 unregulated borewells and estimated that nearly half the city’s boreholes were already dry. These are citywide warning indicators, not measurements for every neighbourhood or individual well.

The 2030 date is a conditional projection, not a prediction that every well will suddenly become empty on a particular day. If present patterns persist, water access could collapse for many households long before an entire underground reserve is exhausted.

Water quality adds another danger. Mercy Corps warned that contamination could affect a very large share of groundwater, citing estimates as high as 80 percent involving sewage and pollutants such as arsenic and nitrates. This figure cannot be applied uniformly to every tap. It does, however, underline the need to test whether available water is safe to drink.

Kabul faces overlapping pressures: population growth, poorly regulated drilling, prolonged drought, changes in snowmelt and rainfall, and expanding paved surfaces that prevent water from soaking back into the ground. When rain runs into drains instead of replenishing an aquifer, the city loses part of its future water security.

Does this mean building roads is wrong? No. Roads, drainage, hospitals and housing are real public needs. The problem is the order of priorities. New housing should not be approved without a sustainable water source, safe wastewater management and an assessment of its effects on local groundwater. Development that ignores water can become tomorrow’s liability.

Nor is it accurate to say authorities are doing nothing. On September 30, 2026, Afghanistan’s Ministry of Energy and Water announced the start of technical studies, surveys and design for transferring water from the Sayad area of Kapisa to Kabul and New Kabul. The ministry said the proposed system could provide 126 million cubic metres annually and benefit more than seven million people. Yet the preparatory studies and design alone are scheduled to take approximately 18 months. Proposed capacity is not water being delivered today. The source area’s environmental and social effects also require careful assessment.

The capital needs an emergency programme measured by outcomes rather than ceremonies. Large commercial and industrial wells should be registered and metered. Excessive extraction needs enforceable limits, but poor households must be offered alternatives rather than abruptly cut off.

Scientifically designed aquifer-recharge systems could retain seasonal water and return suitably clean water to the ground. Expanded pipelines, treatment facilities and dependable municipal distribution would reduce the need for each household to drill ever deeper. Proposals involving Panjshir water and Shah Toot Dam should be assessed as part of a wider plan, with financing, environmental effects and household delivery made explicit.

Treated wastewater can reduce pressure on drinking supplies when reused safely for appropriate irrigation and industrial activities. Finally, the city needs transparency: public reporting by district on groundwater depth, water quality, extraction, budgets and project milestones.

No single dam, deeper borehole or foreign-funded project can solve Kabul’s water crisis alone. Demand management, protection and replenishment of aquifers, and sustainable new supplies must advance together.

Kabul’s residents are entitled to more than kilometres of new tarmac. They are entitled to know whether clean water will still reach their homes a decade from now. That is the real test of development.

Story timeline

Publication and update timeline

  1. Published

  2. Updated

Article: https://margallanews.com/story/opinion-kabul-groundwater-crisis-water-priority-2026-10-08